<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Theocracy on Huffman Writes</title><link>https://www.huffmanwrites.org/tags/theocracy/</link><description>Recent content in Theocracy on Huffman Writes</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.huffmanwrites.org/tags/theocracy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Delusion and the Danger: On Theocrats</title><link>https://www.huffmanwrites.org/posts/essays/the-delusion-and-the-danger/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.huffmanwrites.org/posts/essays/the-delusion-and-the-danger/</guid><description>Two claims, separated on purpose. Delusional first: a politics that grounds law in a divine claim has no mechanism for correcting the interpreters of that claim, so it is unfalsifiable by construction. Then dangerous: that same structure has a track record, and it is running right now.</description></item></channel></rss>