Technology

On Tuesday, September 8, 2026, a 28-year-old researcher named Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic and posted his reasons on X. He had previously worked at OpenAI. He wrote that neither company was acting responsibly, that they were “racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives,” and that the people building the technology “earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”1 Two of his colleagues, still employed, backed him up. Evan Hubinger, a lead in Anthropic’s alignment division, wrote that he personally believed there was a greater than 10 percent chance AI could kill all humans within the next decade, and that the industry did not yet have a plan to solve alignment.2 Samuel Marks, Anthropic’s scalable oversight lead, added the line that should have stopped the conversation: “In general, the more senior the employee, the more concerned they are.”3 ...

Elon Musk and the Engineering of Chaos: A Scholarly Assessment Question: Is the man stupid, evil, both, or something else? Thesis: He is not stupid. He is not evil in the sense of personal malice. He is something more historically novel and institutionally corrosive: a techno-libertarian demolitionist who mistakes engineering intelligence for governing wisdom — a man who has spent three decades acquiring, building, and destroying institutions according to a single algorithm (identify inefficiency, slash personnel, declare victory, move on), and who has now applied that algorithm to the federal government, the public square, and the very idea of institutional continuity. He does not seek to rule. He seeks to reboot. And in the gap between the crash and the reboot, millions suffer. ...

Peter Thiel and the Contrarian’s Revenge: A Scholarly Assessment Question: Is the man stupid, evil, both, or something else? Thesis: He is not stupid. He is not evil in the sense of personal malice. He is something more historically rooted and intellectually ambitious: a plutocratic philosopher-king who has concluded, after decades of reading Strauss, Girard, and the Gospels, that democracy is incompatible with the kind of technological civilization he wants to build — and who has spent his fortune and influence creating the intellectual, political, and surveillance infrastructure for a post-democratic future. He is not a populist demagogue. He is a techno-monarchist operating in plain sight — patient, erudite, and willing to wait a generation for his vision to mature. ...

Correction notice — May 26, 2026. This essay was factually reviewed on 2026-05-26 and republished with specific corrections applied. Among them: removed fabricated citations, including an invented robot (“Shumana”), invented Stanford Cart developer names, and a fabricated RAND study author; corrected dates, attributions, and roles for figures including Minsky, McCarthy, Geoffrey Hinton, and the BDI framework’s origins; corrected specific historical details (SNARC’s 1951 build, the Strategic Computing Initiative’s 1983 launch, OpenAI Five’s release year, the DQN Atari count, Brynjolfsson et al.’s citation, and several others); and removed fabricated co-authors from the Silver et al. and Mnih et al. reference entries. A reader who compared the original May 21, 2026 version to the current text would see that the historical claims, attributions, and reference list have been tightened throughout. The work should be read as corrected, not as it first appeared. If you spot a remaining error, please email phil@huffmanwrites.org. ...

I was ready to do something drastic. My machine had been running hot for weeks. Disk usage climbing, performance lagging, the kind of quiet degradation that starts as inconvenience and ends as crisis. I had installed AnythingLLM to test it, decided it wasn’t ready, uninstalled it — and yet the space never came back. The numbers didn’t lie. Something was eating my disk, and I couldn’t see it. The easy answer was staring at me: clean install. Wipe the whole system, start fresh, rebuild from zero. It’s the digital equivalent of the scorched-earth impulse — the one that says, if I can’t understand the problem, I’ll eliminate the conditions that produced it. I’ve done it before. Most of us have. It feels like control. It feels like decisiveness. It is almost always a confession that we have failed to understand what we are actually dealing with. ...

The Stoic CGM A Data-Driven Guide to Reinventing Yourself Executive Summary The Stoic CGM treats continuous glucose monitoring as a practice of self-knowledge—not merely a medical intervention, but a discipline of attention applied to the body’s own politics. It examines what happens when Stoic principles meet metabolic data: how to respond to information without being ruled by it, and how to govern the self when the self is constantly in motion. The core message: the body is not an enemy to defeat, but a system to comprehend. ...