<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Executive-Power on Huffman Writes</title><link>https://www.huffmanwrites.org/tags/executive-power/</link><description>Recent content in Executive-Power on Huffman Writes</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.huffmanwrites.org/tags/executive-power/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Consider the Source: Project 2025 and the Ledger</title><link>https://www.huffmanwrites.org/posts/essays/consider-the-source/</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.huffmanwrites.org/posts/essays/consider-the-source/</guid><description>A 920-page plan written by a private foundation, disavowed by the candidate it was written for, and now roughly half of it is policy. The most useful thing to do with a document this consequential is read it, including the parts that are not in it.</description></item></channel></rss>