Senate Race Report: October 11, 2026

Question: Twenty-three days from Election Day the professionals moved in one direction without exception, and the money moved the other way, so which of them should a reader believe?

Answer: Both, because they are answering different questions. Ten rating changes landed this week across five forecasters, and every one of them moved toward the Democrats.¹²³⁴ Cook Political Report revised its estimate of Democratic pickups upward to two to six seats and called Kansas “Democrats’ Cinderella story of the cycle.”¹⁵ Sabato’s Crystal Ball moved Alaska out of its toss-up column and then wrote the sentence that will be quoted until November: “For the first time all cycle, Republicans now need to win more of our Toss-ups to hold the Senate than Democrats need to win in order to flip it.”²

The markets did the opposite, and by a small, legible amount. Kalshi’s own desk priced Democratic Senate control at 65 percent on October 6 and at 61 percent on October 9.⁶⁷ Its Michigan market took Abdul El-Sayed from a brief all-time high of 74 percent down to 67, and its Texas market took James Talarico from a new high of 67 percent down to 63.⁸⁹¹⁰ That is a market marking down two specific candidates after two specific bad weeks, not a market changing its mind about the country.

Both readings are honest, and the gap between them is the whole story of the week. The forecasters re-rated the map on the strength of a month of polling in places like Kansas and New Hampshire. The exchanges trimmed their prices on the strength of a debate in Grand Rapids and a case of flu in Texas. Neither is a contradiction. A 61 percent price and a two-to-six-seat projection are both describing a Democratic majority that has become the likelier outcome and still has not been assembled: four net flips, and not one of them banked.

What Changed This Week

The forecasters swept, all in one direction. Cook moved three Senate ratings on October 6, and each moved toward the Democrats: Kansas from lean Republican to toss-up, New Hampshire from toss-up to lean Democratic, and North Carolina from lean Democratic to likely Democratic.¹ Written up that evening, Cook’s reasoning was arithmetic rather than adjective: “At this point, the question isn’t whether Democrats will gain seats, but how many,” the forecaster wrote, revising its estimate of potential pickups to “two to six seats for Democrats,” which it called “squarely within the range of the four seats they need to net for a majority.”¹⁵ It described Kansas as “Democrats’ Cinderella story of the cycle,” and said of New Hampshire that “This race could still end up being closer than it should be given the national environment.”¹

Sabato’s Crystal Ball moved four ratings the same day, two of them Senate seats. Alaska went from toss-up to leans Democratic, and South Carolina from safe Republican to likely Republican.³ On Alaska it wrote that of the Democrats’ red-state targets, Alaska “may be the most promising,” citing a New York Times and Siena poll that put Mary Peltola ahead of Dan Sullivan by seven.²³¹¹ On South Carolina it described Darline Graham as “only nominally ahead” of Annie Andrews while still expecting her to prevail, calling her and Minnesota’s Peggy Flanagan “flawed candidates facing credible challengers” who “should be fine in the end.”³ The tally behind it is 49 seats at least leaning Democratic, 47 at least leaning Republican, and four toss-ups, and the arithmetic underneath that tally is the week’s real finding: Republicans need three of the four toss-ups for a 50-50 majority with the vice president’s tiebreaker, while Democrats need only two of them for 51 seats.¹²¹³ Prior to the Alaska move, each side had needed three of five.

The two model columns moved on October 9. Decision Desk HQ took Alaska to lean Democratic with the flip flag and Kansas from likely to lean Republican; the Silver Bulletin moved Nebraska to lean Republican and North Carolina from likely to solid Democratic.⁴ RealClearPolitics moved North Carolina to likely Democratic in its October 5 update.⁴ Counted across the five, that is ten changes in one week and not a single one toward the Republicans.⁴

The markets cooled, and the cooling has causes. Kalshi’s national Senate control market read 65 percent for the Democrats on October 6, 64 on October 7, 62 on October 8, and 61 on October 9, and the state markets show where the four points went.⁶⁹⁵⁷ Michigan’s first general-election debate, in Grand Rapids on October 8, cost El-Sayed six points of price: he had touched 74 percent on October 6, and by October 9 he sat at 67.⁸⁷¹⁴ Texas was the flu. Talarico had held no in-person campaign event since September 26 and no private fundraiser since September 28, a twelve-day absence that ran from a viral “Where is James Talarico?” chant at Ken Paxton’s San Antonio rally into a Truth Social post from the president calling him “MISSING IN ACTION” and demanding he “should immediately report to a Debate Stage against Ken Paxton, who is ready, willing and able.”^10151617 Talarico’s answer, posted the same day, was the week’s most effective sentence: “President Trump just said Ken Paxton should debate. I agree. Ball’s in your court @KenPaxtonTX.”¹⁵ He returned to the trail Friday at the Austin City Limits festival, telling reporters he had spent seven days sick in bed with “a nasty case of the flu.”¹⁰

Kansas had the strangest week of any state. Roger Marshall’s campaign aired an advertisement during Sunday’s Chiefs game alleging that Adam Hamilton “protected a pedophile,” illustrated with images of two Kansas businesses that had nothing to do with the case. Tall Oaks Camp and Conference Center in Linwood sent a cease-and-desist, and its board member Lea Ann Combs said, “It looks like he is saying that this happened at Tall Oaks when it did not happen at Tall Oaks.”¹⁸ The Valley Cabins in Lacygne also asked for removal. Marshall’s senior adviser Brent Robertson answered that “The Adam Hamilton child molestation cover-up happened at a place different than the stock image of a camp that was used,” and said the image had been corrected.¹⁸ Meanwhile the Democratic side, which has watched Kansas climb all year, is still watching it. Senate Majority PAC chief spokesperson Lauren French told reporters Tuesday that the group is “watching really closely” the races in Kansas, Florida, South Carolina and Mississippi, while committing money in nine other states, and said only, “Broadly, we are very pleased with the state of the race right now.”¹²

North Carolina emptied out. The Senate Leadership Fund paused its North Carolina spending last week and redirected the rest to Iowa and Texas, and this week the reporting put a number on the retreat: the fund had originally planned $71 million for Michael Whatley, spent about $30 million, and moved the balance elsewhere, less than half the pledged amount.¹⁹ Whatley’s own campaign has no television booked past this week.¹⁹ Senate Majority PAC then canceled its television and digital spending in the state from the other side.¹² Both parties leaving a state at once is not a sign of a close race; it is a sign of a settled one.

Michigan’s debate was the week’s ugliest hour of television. El-Sayed called Rogers “weak,” “cowardly,” and a “sock puppet for the Trump administration”; Rogers called El-Sayed a “glitchy AI chatbot” running “the best con I think I’ve ever seen,” said he was “bought off by Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda,” and suggested El-Sayed’s mother had ties to groups working in the Middle East.¹⁴⁸ Rogers also pressed El-Sayed on his family’s finances, saying, “At least Florida is in the United States,” to which El-Sayed replied, “It’s not in Michigan, my guy.”¹⁴ The moderator, Rick Albin, offered the line of the night: “In 30 years of doing debates, I’ve never seen it continue during the commercial, but it did.”⁸²⁰ The night before, the president had attacked El-Sayed on Truth Social by a name that is not his, writing that he “goes back to the days of the Jihad” and is a “RADICAL Extremist, Terrorist Sympathizer.”⁸ El-Sayed’s response: “He’s not just attacking me. He’s attacking all of us.”⁸ On October 9, AIPAC’s super PAC resumed spending in the race after a pause, putting $95,000 into mailers aimed at 130,000 Jewish voters.²¹

Maine got an ethics complaint and a poll. On October 7 an attorney named Valerie Adams filed a complaint with the Senate Select Committee on Ethics asking it to examine a ProPublica report that Susan Collins directed $8 million in defense contracts to the Hawaii firm Navatek in exchange for donations from its chief executive, Martin Kao, who pleaded guilty to money laundering and bank fraud in 2022.²² Collins has denied the allegations and called them outrageous; her spokesperson said, “This is getting to be pathetic.”²² The complaint has no bearing on the polling, which was already close, and the first two debates put the two candidates on a stage with the war and the cost of living between them.²³²⁴

The national numbers kept getting worse for the party in power. Pew Research, in the field September 28 to October 4, put the president’s approval at 30 percent against 68 percent disapproval, the lowest of his second term, and comparable to the 29 percent low of his first, with approval among his own 2024 voters down to 67 percent from 75 percent in July.²⁵ On the generic congressional ballot the same survey had Democrats ahead 44 to 36.²⁶ The Silver Bulletin’s average, updated October 9, sat at D plus 8.9, a cycle high, after Democrats “recently broke 50 percent support for the first time in our average.”²⁷ Oil finished a second week near the century mark: Brent settled at $104.72 on October 9 and West Texas Intermediate at $91.85, with pump diesel at $6.28 a gallon, up almost 70 percent since February 28.²⁸²⁹ The president’s attempt to take the war off the table helped his politics less than it helped the market: “We will not be attacking Iran at any time prior to the Midterm Elections to be held in the United States on November 3rd,” he posted, and the market largely shrugged.²⁸

The Defense

Michigan is still the most competitive Democratic seat in the country, and the debate did what debates in close races do: it gave the Republican something to spend. El-Sayed remains ahead in the public polling, but by less than a month ago. A Quantus Insights poll released this week put him ahead 48 to 47, a single point.³⁰ The price moved further than the polls did, which is the nature of a market pricing a single bad night. The spending in the state has passed $205 million, with Republican groups at $59.3 million against $23 million for El-Sayed’s backers.³¹ The one number that has not changed is the one that matters most: El-Sayed runs ahead of his party in a state with an even partisan index, and a two-point lead three weeks out is a coin flip with better fundraising.

Georgia is the second seat, and it is no longer being treated as a contest. A Trafalgar Group survey, from a Republican firm, put Ossoff ahead 51 to 43 in the field October 7 to 9, and the debate on October 8 was Ossoff putting the Republican nominee on trial, accusing Collins of having “hired half the Third Reich to staff your congressional office.”³²³³ The most telling number is not the margin but the direction of the money: Ossoff has spent $57 million with $13 million reserved, Collins-aligned groups have spent more than $52 million, and Collins’s campaign itself has booked no advertising.³⁴ Early in-person voting opens October 13, the day of the second debate.³³

Minnesota is the defense seat that will not settle, and the polls there keep splitting by sponsor. Rasmussen, in the field October 5 to 7 with 856 likely voters, had Flanagan ahead 48 to 45.³⁵ A KSTP and SurveyUSA poll had the race tied at 42, and Cook’s reasoning for moving the race to likely Democratic was unusually blunt: it was skeptical, it said, of “some public polling that has shown the race close.”³⁶ Senator John Thune came to Le Sueur on October 5 to campaign for Michele Tafoya and would not say whether national money would follow him, which is itself an answer: the party’s Senate committee is concentrating on seven states that do not include Minnesota.³⁷ Flanagan’s own framing is the one worth remembering. “I have always run for office like I’m 10 points behind,” she said.³⁶ Tafoya’s is that “We have had three or four straight weeks of really solid polling here that shows this race a toss up.”³⁷

New Hampshire is the seat that moved toward the Democrats and got closer anyway. Cook took it to lean Democratic on October 6, and the polling underneath that move is thin: an AARP poll conducted by the New Hampshire Institute of Politics found Chris Pappas ahead 51 to 44 statewide, but only 49 to 48 among voters fifty and older, and a Rasmussen survey in the field October 2 to 4 had Pappas ahead 49 to 44, down from an eleven-point lead in early September.³⁸³⁹ The market is not listening to any of it, pricing Pappas at 90 percent on October 9.⁴⁰ The case for the Republican is the one New Hampshire Public Radio named: John Sununu is not, in its correspondent’s phrase, “a Trump Republican from central casting,” and his one Senate term was well regarded in the state.⁴⁰

The other nine Democratic seats, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Virginia, are not in play.

The Offense, Tiered

North Carolina remains the anchor of every path, and it is now a race that only one side is funding. Cooper led by seven in an East Carolina University poll of 810 likely voters, from the field September 30 to October 3, unchanged from a month earlier with the undecided share cut in half to six percent; he leads independents by sixteen.⁴¹ Cooper bought nearly $2 million in air time in a single week and has $7.3 million reserved through Election Day.¹⁹ Whatley’s answer, asked about the withdrawal, was, “We have the resources that we need to be able to reach the voters,” followed by, “We have been on air for a long time. We are having conversations right now about the best way to go, down the stretch.”¹⁹ The two candidates have still not agreed to debate each other, which would make 2026 the first North Carolina Senate cycle without one since 1998.⁴²

Ohio and Texas are the two coin flips, and the polling in Ohio has begun to separate. A CNN poll conducted by SSRS, in the field September 29 to October 5 with 760 likely voters, put Sherrod Brown ahead 49 to 43, with the president’s approval in Ohio at 36 percent and 76 percent of likely voters saying his policies had increased the cost of living there.⁴³⁴⁴ A co/efficient survey taken October 5 and 6 found the opposite, with Jon Husted ahead 44 to 43.⁴⁵ The independent vote is where the race is really being decided, and Suffolk University found Brown ahead by 27 points among independents, against 16 for El-Sayed in Michigan and 28 for Turek in Iowa.⁴⁶ Money is arriving accordingly: AdImpact counted $250 million spent on Ohio statewide advertising by the end of September with another $140 million reserved, and Vice President Vance was in Lima on October 9 with the president due in Youngstown on October 12.⁴⁷⁴⁸⁴⁹ Over 120,000 Ohioans had already voted by Friday.⁴⁷

Texas is the week’s cautionary tale about a market that prices a candidate rather than a map. The polling is not obviously worse for Talarico: a UMass Lowell and YouGov survey in the field September 18 to 28 had the race tied at 45, and a Trafalgar Group poll from October 6 to 8 had him ahead 47.1 to 43.6.⁵⁰⁵¹ The absence, though, handed the Republicans ten days of message, and the money in the state is not a race so much as a bonfire: AdImpact counted $445 million spent on Texas advertising, $326 million of it Republican and $120 million Democratic, with a Senate Leadership Fund spin-off called Texas PAC carrying $122 million to aid Paxton.⁵² Paxton’s problem is that he has refused every debate he has been offered, including one moderated by Bret Baier, after promising in July that “of course we’re going to debate.”¹⁵ A Republican strategist, Brendan Steinhauser, told MS NOW what the money cannot fix: “Pocket book issues. And people are struggling, no matter what the president says, no matter what Republicans say.”⁵² Ted Cruz’s version was blunter: “We could lose Texas. This is a five-alarm fire right now.”⁵¹

Maine is the seat where the polling and the price disagree most, and the reason is a question about turnout. Marist, in the field October 1 to 4 with 1,505 registered voters, had Troy Jackson ahead 51 to 47, with independents breaking for him 52 to 45 and Maine voters reporting the president’s approval at 40 to 59.²³ A Washington Post and George Washington University survey released October 9 had it 50 to 46, and a Rasmussen poll in the field October 5 to 8 put Jackson ahead 49 to 47.⁵³⁵⁴ Marist found that 57 percent of Mainers expect Collins to win anyway, and Kalshi’s price agrees with the expectation rather than the poll, though even it has drifted toward the challenger, pricing Jackson at 56 percent and Collins at 44 after the first debate.²³²⁴

The two debates gave the state its clearest look yet at the choice. On October 6, asked about Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Jackson said, “It’s time that ICE is disbanded and we go back into putting that money into Customs and Border Patrol,” and Collins answered that “you can not abolish ICE, but it does need reform.”⁵⁵ On October 8 Jackson accused Collins and her husband of profiting from the war in Iran: “She could use her leverage to stop the war, but instead they are making money,” he said, and Collins replied, “That is absolutely outrageous, and you owe me an apology.”⁵⁶ She did not receive one, and the Boston Globe called the evening “heavy on mud and light on clarity.”⁵⁶ The first debate also produced the week’s best line about the price of things, when Jackson mocked the road salt exemption Collins had secured for the state: “I didn’t mock the fact that she got road salt back. I mocked the fact that: What about everything else? You can’t eat rock salt.”²⁴ Barack Obama endorsed Jackson in a video released the morning of the second debate, saying, “Troy Jackson is running to be your next senator, and I’m proud to be on board,” and a Collins spokesperson answered that Jackson is “endorsed by Obama, funded by Chuck Schumer, and campaigning with Bernie Sanders.”⁵⁷ Money followed both ways. The Democratic group WinSenate is running a $3.4 million corruption campaign against Collins, part of more than $32.7 million spent in Maine, and the Senate Leadership Fund answered by releasing four new advertisements against Jackson this week, one of them titled “Troy Jackson Is Too Corrupt For Maine.”⁵⁸⁵⁹

Alaska is the week’s genuine surprise, and it earned it. A New York Times and Siena poll in the field through September 30 put Peltola ahead 50 to 43, and Sabato responded by moving the race to leans Democratic, with Decision Desk HQ following on October 9.¹¹²⁴ An Alaska Survey Research poll reported October 7 had Peltola ahead 51 to 49 after the third round of ranked-choice allocation.⁶⁰ Alaska is the one competitive race where the partisan baseline is a hurdle rather than a wall, and the ranked-choice ballot adds a complication that has nothing to do with either candidate: two men named Dan Sullivan are on it, the incumbent and a retired schoolteacher whose disqualification was overturned first by a Superior Court judge and then by the state Supreme Court.⁶¹ Peltola’s advertising has been running away from her own party rather than toward the middle: “If it’s not good for Alaska, it’s not getting my vote.”⁶² The Republican counter-argument arrived by air, when Vice President Vance told a hangar in Fairbanks that “The Democrats are obsessed with this state this cycle,” and asked, “What did Mary Peltola do for Alaska’s fishermen when she was in office? Not a damn thing.”⁶³

Iowa’s polls split in both directions again this week, which is now the defining fact of the race. Suffolk University, in the field October 1 to 4, had Josh Turek ahead 48 to 44; Emerson College, in the field October 5 and 6, had Ashley Hinson ahead 47 to 45; the CNN poll had Hinson ahead 45 to 43; and a New York Times and Siena survey had Hinson ahead by a single point.^46644411 Suffolk’s director, David Paleologos, offered the most useful explanation of the pattern, and it was not about Iowa: “We’re seeing overwhelming support for Democratic nominees among those who identify as independents in these three states,” he said, meaning Iowa, Ohio and Michigan. “These are the people who swing state elections.”⁴⁶ The one debate both candidates accepted took place on Iowa PBS on October 7, and it produced a Turek line that summarized the Democratic case better than any advertisement has: “Iowans are hurting and they’re hurting uniquely.”⁶⁵ Ashley Hinson’s own closing was that she is “a working mom,” and her promise on Social Security was categorical: “I have not voted for cuts to Social Security benefits, and I will not support cuts to Social Security benefits.”⁶⁵

Nebraska remains the wildcard, and it is still the cheapest fourth seat on the board. A YouGov survey in the field September 24 to October 3 with 1,809 likely voters put Dan Osborn ahead of Pete Ricketts 48 to 47, with just three percent undecided and 95 percent of Osborn’s supporters saying their minds were made up.⁶⁶ The Silver Bulletin responded by moving the race from likely to lean Republican, which is the right read of a tied poll in a state the president carried by about twenty points: an independent still needs a coalition that does not exist yet.⁴ The money, though, is arriving as though the race were real. Independent expenditures have passed $15 million, with about $7.9 million spent against Osborn or for Ricketts and $7.3 million against Ricketts or for Osborn.⁶⁷ Osborn also collected the endorsement of National Security Leaders for America, a group of 1,600 retired national security professionals, whose retired Air Force Brigadier General Dan Woodward said of him, “He was not born with a silver spoon in his mouth. He is not a billionaire.”⁶⁸

Kansas is the margin seat, and it has now acquired everything a margin seat needs except the money on its own side. Cook moved it to toss-up, a New York Times and Siena poll had it tied at 45, a YouGov poll had Hamilton ahead 48 to 45, and the Republican Party’s principal Senate fund has reserved nearly $8.2 million to hold a state it won by sixteen points two years ago.^1116970 The Democratic Party’s principal Senate fund has reserved nothing, saying only that it is watching closely.¹² The honest caution is unchanged: Kansas produced competitive September polls in 2014 and 2020, and the Republicans won both Novembers by double digits.⁷¹ What is different is not the poll. It is that one party is paying eight million dollars to defend a state it used to take for granted, and the other is deciding whether to make it a fight.

Florida is not a race again, but it is closer than a safe state should be. A St. Pete Polls survey in the field October 5 to 7 put Ashley Moody ahead of Angie Nixon 47 to 45, inside the margin of error, after an earlier poll found the race tied.⁷² A Mason-Dixon poll for NBC 6 and Telemundo, in the field September 28 to October 1, had Moody ahead 50 to 40.⁷³ Moody has declined every general-election debate offered her, telling an interviewer that she is “running against someone who is truly anti-American and is a Democrat Socialist,” and that “I’m not going to give a stage or any attention to that.”⁷⁴ Nixon’s response was that “Unelected Ashley Moody’s unhinged rhetoric and refusal to debate isn’t strength; it’s pure cowardice.”⁷⁴

Louisiana and Mississippi remain long shots with real activity and no new polling. Julia Letlow released a television advertisement on flood insurance, saying, “Flood insurance has gone up 200%,” and a local analyst summarized the race better than any poll: “Even if the national trend is favoring Democrats, it’s still a Republican’s race to lose in Louisiana.”⁷⁵⁷⁶ In Mississippi, Scott Colom campaigned with a supporter in an inflatable chicken suit and said of Cindy Hyde-Smith, “So far she is refusing to debate because she is chicken,” while her campaign manager answered that “Losing candidates always want a debate about debates.”⁷⁷⁷⁸

Montana and South Carolina are Republican-favored and no longer comfortable. In Montana, a NonStop Local poll from mid-September had Kurt Alme at 45.1 percent against the independent Seth Bodnar at 26.1 and the Democrat Alani Bankhead at 18.9, and Alme declined the Montana Broadcasters Association debate on October 11, leaving the other candidates on the stage without him.⁷⁹⁸⁰ In South Carolina, a Rasmussen survey in the field October 5 to 8 put Darline Graham ahead of Annie Andrews 49 to 45, and Sabato moved the race from safe Republican to likely Republican while still expecting Graham to prevail.⁸¹³ The Senate Leadership Fund has pledged $5 million to the state, and Andrews has outspent the field by a wide margin: $6.1 million on advertising since early September, against $687,000 from outside Republican groups.⁸² A Winthrop University political scientist, Scott Huffmon, put the stakes plainly: “Everything about this race is historic,” he said, and “Andrews still has that uphill climb as long as Republicans turn out.”⁸³

The nine safe Republican seats, Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Wyoming, are not in play.

The Math

The forecasters and the markets separated this week for the first time this cycle, and the separation is small enough to be informative rather than alarming. Cook now projects a Democratic gain of two to six seats; Sabato’s tally is 49 seats at least leaning Democratic with four toss-ups; Kalshi prices Democratic control at 61 percent; Decision Desk HQ’s model, the most independent column in the table below, sits at 54.¹¹²⁷⁴ Every one of those describes the same chamber: a Democratic majority that is more likely than not, and that requires four flips which are individually plausible and collectively unproven.

The paths have not changed in their order, only in their price. The market path is North Carolina, Ohio and Texas, plus one of Maine, Alaska, Iowa or Nebraska. The consensus path is North Carolina, Ohio, Maine, and Alaska or Iowa, which requires winning the top four and assumes the defense holds everywhere. The nightmare is any loss among Michigan, Minnesota or New Hampshire, because every defensive loss raises the requirement to five flips, and five flips means winning Kansas or Nebraska or Florida on top of everything else.⁸⁴

The Kansas connection is the whole of the argument, and this week it became a two-party argument for the first time. A month ago Kansas was a curiosity, a week ago it earned a row in the table below, and this week Cook moved it to toss-up, the New York Times found it tied, and the Republican Party’s Senate fund put eight million dollars against a state it used to win by sixteen points. What has not happened is the other half: the Democratic Senate fund is watching, not spending.¹² If the Democrats sweep North Carolina, Ohio and Texas, Kansas is not needed. If any one of those slips, Kansas becomes the margin seat, and a margin seat that only one party is paying for is a margin seat that stays where it is.

The ratings table

The columns are refreshed on different schedules and the differences are real, so the dates are given per column rather than averaged: Cook October 6; Inside Elections October 1; Sabato October 6; RealClearPolitics October 5; Decision Desk HQ October 9; Silver Bulletin October 9.⁴ This was the busiest week of the cycle across these five forecasters, and the table shows it: nine of its cells changed, and the tenth change belongs to a row the table does not carry, South Carolina moving in Sabato’s column.³⁴

A word on what the columns mean. PVI is the Cook Partisan Voting Index, and it is the only backward-looking number here. It measures how far a state leans from the nation as a whole, computed from the 2020 and 2024 presidential two-party vote shares weighted toward 2024, and Cook says of it that the race ratings reflect an outlook for which party will win the next election, while the PVI takes a longer view. It earns its place as contrast, which is what makes “Tossup in an R+6 state” legible, and not as a forecast. Lean is a strong prior across the whole map: Pew found 158 of 176 Senate elections since 2012, 89.8 percent, went the way of the state’s presidential carry. But applied as the sole predictor to the competitive races this series tracks, lean calls five correctly and misses four, Georgia, North Carolina, Ohio and Texas, every one of which it would call Republican and every one of which the forecasters now favor for the Democrat. That is not a contradiction but a selection effect: a race earns its way onto this table precisely by being a case where the baseline does not settle it. The rule that follows is simple, and it is the reason the PVI column sits first and means least: never argue from PVI against the forecasters, because where the two disagree, the forecasters are the point of the exercise.

There are two traps in reading that column, and both make it look inconsistent with numbers quoted elsewhere. The first is that PVI is denominated in vote share for one party, not margin, which makes it roughly half the size of a margin-style lean: Cook calls Texas R+6 while Silver’s partisan lean calls the same state R+11, and both are right, because the denominators differ. Never place a PVI figure beside a margin figure without saying which is which. The second is that the scale flattens elasticity, how hard a state swings when the nation swings, and elasticity is orthogonal to lean, correlating with it at only r = +0.12 across these races. New Hampshire, at 1.15, and Maine, at 1.13, are among the most elastic states in the country, with many cross-pressured moderates who swing hard; Georgia, at 0.90, is among the most inelastic, with a bifurcated electorate and few persuadable voters, which is why it can be rated comfortably Democratic while leaning Republican on the baseline. Texas, at 1.03, is dead average. A state can be strongly partisan and highly elastic at once, which is why a lean column can never stand in for a competitiveness column.

IE is Inside Elections, Nathan Gonzales’s nonpartisan newsletter, one forecaster among several. The rating scale runs, strongest to weakest, solid, likely, lean, tilt, and toss-up, and Tilt is Inside Elections’ own rating: Cook, Sabato and Decision Desk HQ do not use it, so a Tilt appearing only in the IE column is not a disagreement but a finer scale. Decision Desk HQ publishes win probabilities that map onto the same ladder: above 95 percent is solid, 80 to 95 likely, 65 to 80 lean, and 35 to 65 a toss-up for either party. (flip) marks a rating that forecasts a change of party from the current holder.

A note on the sources. One column in that table is arithmetic and six are not. PVI alone can be reproduced from certified FEC totals, which we have done, matching Cook’s published figures; everything else is somebody’s assessment. Cook, Inside Elections, Sabato and RealClearPolitics are analyst judgment, which means their ratings cannot be independently reproduced from any underlying data, because the rating is the data. That is expert opinion in a table rather than a measurement, and it is not a scandal: election analysis is not a solved problem. RealClearPolitics is worse than unaudited, because it blocks automated reading, so we cannot say whether that column is independent judgment or a composite of the others; treat it as unlisted rather than as a seventh opinion. Decision Desk HQ and Silver are published models, and Decision Desk HQ is the most independent column here, using neither expert ratings nor Cook’s PVI and deriving its prior from the most recent presidential margin adjusted for the national swing. Silver’s FLIPR is not independent in the same way, because in its default build it feeds the Cook, Inside Elections and Sabato ratings in as an input at roughly one-sixth weight, so where his column agrees with theirs the agreement is partly built in and is not corroboration. Silver has acknowledged the recursion risk himself, observing that if expert raters calibrate against his forecast, the whole process becomes somewhat recursive. All six read the same polls and talk to the same operatives, which means six agreeing columns are not six confirmations; the signal is where they disagree, and this week that is Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska and Texas. Freshness differs per column and is stated above rather than averaged. One caveat this week: Inside Elections’ own machine-readable export, which supplies our move data, was unreachable when this report was assembled, so the IE column was read from the aggregate ratings table and its date should be treated as indicative rather than exact.⁴

The Close

Twenty-three days is enough time for the thing the markets did this week to become the thing that mattered. El-Sayed lost six points of price to a debate in which the other man went after his mother, and Talarico lost four to a week in bed with the flu. Neither of those is a fact about Kansas, or New Hampshire, or Maine, and neither is a fact about November either; both are facts about how thin the margin is for a party that needs four flips and cannot afford to spend a week on the defensive in a state it has to win.

That is what makes this week’s split between the forecasters and the exchanges worth keeping rather than resolving. The forecasters looked at a month of polling and moved ten ratings in one direction, because the underlying environment, a president at 30 percent approval and diesel at $6.28 a gallon, is not ambiguous.²⁵²⁸ The markets looked at two candidates and priced the specific ways a good year can still go wrong. A reader who takes 61 percent as a prophecy will be surprised either way. A reader who takes it as a price will understand that the Democrats have become the favorites for a majority that still depends on four separate evenings going their way in November, three weeks from now.

Notes

PRH | huffmanwrites.org | © Philip Huffman